shhh, the gods have ears

home    message    submit    archive    theme
©

In May of 1948, author Ayn Rand received a letter from a fan named Joanne Rondeau. In it, she asked Rand to explain a sentence in her bestselling 1943 novel, The Fountainhead, which reads:

To say ‘I love you’ one must first know how to say the ‘I’.

Rand responded with the following letter. 

(Source: Little Big Book Of Life; Image: Ayn Rand, via.)

May 22, 1948

Dear Ms. Rondeau:

You asked me to explain the meaning of my sentence in The Fountainhead: “To say ‘I love you’ one must first know how to say the ‘I.”

The meaning of that sentence is contained in the whole of The Fountainhead. And it is stated right in the speech on page 400 from which you took the sentence. The meaning of the “I” is an independent, self-sufficient entity that does not exist for the sake of any other person.

A person who exists only for the sake of his loved one is not an independent entity, but a spiritual parasite. The love of a parasite is worth nothing.

The usual (and very vicious) nonsense preached on the subject of love claims that love is self-sacrifice. A man’s self is his spirit. If one sacrifices his spirit, who or what is left to feel the love? True love is profoundly selfish, in the noblest meaning of the word — it is an expression of one’s highest values. When a person is in love, he seeks his own happiness — and not his sacrifice to the loved one. And the loved one would be a monster if she wanted or expected such sacrifice.

Any person who wants to live for others — for one sweetheart or for the whole of mankind — is a selfless nonentity. An independent “I” is a person who exists for his own sake. Such a person does not make any vicious pretense of self-sacrifice and does not demand it from the person he loves. Which is the only way to be in love and the only form of a self-respecting relationship between two people.

Ayn Rand

(Source: lettersofnote.com)




44 notes
  1. imageuponimage reblogged this from mostexerent
  2. intoyourear reblogged this from mostexerent
  3. theartofboredom reblogged this from mostexerent
  4. loursrogie reblogged this from mostexerent
  5. blackguyatwork reblogged this from mostexerent
  6. andrewakessler said: Instead of reading Rand, perhaps you should read Schopenhauer, who rather than attempting to empower the ego sought to eliminate the ego. Being one with the world is considerably better than attempting to bend it to your will.
  7. sparkme reblogged this from mostexerent
  8. landonmedina reblogged this from mostexerent
  9. damerinomenefreghista said: Hard to argue against Ayn Rand, and even though you should love yourself first and foremost; if you don’t love your significant other as much as yourself, you’re prone to hurt them. And you’ll end up alone if you always place first before anyone.
  10. eightinhand said: Ayn Rand was a pathological narcissist and a dismal writer who espoused an incoherent, culturally toxic philosophy. Quoting her says a lot about you. Bye!
  11. mostexerent posted this